Thanks to the BCC folks for inviting me to contribute as a guest for a couple of weeks. I was born and raised in the Church, served a mission in the U.S., graduated from BYU, completed a Ph.D. in microbiology, and am now a postdoctoral researcher. Yes, and I have a family too. I spend more time than I should thinking about science and religion, and I record some of my thoughts at LDS Science Review.
Although I have almost certainly read more about LDS history than the average American Mormon, I am by no means a historian and I do not keep close tabs on academic debates over Church history. However, I have read enough to know that there is a running discussion–decades long–about how historians should tell the history of the Church. My understanding is that so-called ‘faithful history’ has emerged as a kind of compromise position for historians who wish to remain members in good standing, not raise the ire of Church headquarters, and maintain readers among believing Latter-day Saints. This approach aims to lay out all pertinent facts and arguments without challenging the authenticity of the foundational miracles of the Church or its divine guidance and authority. It is ‘warts and all’ history that is ultimately faith affirming. In a recent
FARMS Review essay, Richard Sherlock argued that the ‘faithful history’ concept should be applied to science. After drawing the connection he wrote:
(more…)